-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10460/#review19155
-----------------------------------------------------------



third_party/libprocess/include/process/gtest.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10460/#comment39733>

    I know I called this AWAIT_READY. But looking at how you renamed things, I 
would prefer
    
    ASSERT_READY()
    
    This tells me you are doing an assert.
    
    That way you can also have EXPECT_READY(), which you are missing.



third_party/libprocess/include/process/gtest.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10460/#comment39734>

    ditto. s/AWAIT_FAILED/ASSERT_FAILED



third_party/libprocess/include/process/gtest.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10460/#comment39735>

    ditto



third_party/libprocess/src/tests/process_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10460/#comment39732>

    How about just EXPECT_READY?



third_party/libprocess/src/tests/statistics_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10460/#comment39731>

    I think these read better as ASSERT_READY()? Why AWAIT_ASSERT_READY?


- Vinod Kone


On April 15, 2013, 2:28 a.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10460/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 15, 2013, 2:28 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Vinod Kone and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   third_party/libprocess/include/process/gtest.hpp 
> 80d5194489bc8f5d4897a075e655d543480e314e 
>   third_party/libprocess/src/tests/io_tests.cpp 
> 9115a968b81739c33afe98b673797ca472cc8b87 
>   third_party/libprocess/src/tests/process_tests.cpp 
> 562f52c6833183e6e4e81f6ae307cf28e40404b3 
>   third_party/libprocess/src/tests/statistics_tests.cpp 
> 6efcc8004fc637e5c4dc8f0ba0e34c0a06a8c052 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10460/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Hindman
> 
>

Reply via email to