An alternative: os::alive(pid_t) os::children(pid_t) os::stat(pid_t)
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Benjamin Mahler <[email protected] > wrote: > Is there any consensus on how to place process utilities in stout? I would > expect this to be in a process:: namespace but of course that is confusing > because we use libprocess, which should perhaps have a libprocess:: > namespace instead.. > > I'll be moving process utilities etc into stout, hopefully with the same > calls for linux and OSX but I'm not yet certain if that is possible. I > would like to place these in a process.hpp file inside a process:: > namespace. > > I think these read very nicely: > process::alive(pid_t) > process::children(pid_t) > process::stat(pid_t) > > Thoughts? > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Yan Xu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This batch of commits changed the reaper to use "Future" as the >> notification mechanism. >> >> Sequence: >> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10744/ >> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10745/ >> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10746/ >> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10747/ >> >> Best, >> Yan >> -- >> Jiang Yan Xu <[email protected]> @xujyan <http://twitter.com/xujyan> >> > >
