> On May 17, 2013, 7:43 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote: > > support/post-reviews.py, lines 151-168 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/11160/diff/1/?file=291864#file291864line151> > > > > Hmm. Are you still seeing issues with post-reviews? If not, lets > > discard this. We wan't to catch errors!
I'm still struggling to get post-reviews to work. It could be that I'm bad at using it. - Brenden ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11160/#review20728 ----------------------------------------------------------- On May 14, 2013, 5:58 p.m., Brenden Matthews wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/11160/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated May 14, 2013, 5:58 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos. > > > Description > ------- > > From 80f280af52a7256dec0b8e273791f531634de9dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Brenden Matthews <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 10:22:56 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH 5/5] Ignore errors from post-review. > > When updating existing reviews, post-review returns errors erroneously. > > Review: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11160 > --- > support/post-reviews.py | 13 +++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > Diffs > ----- > > support/post-reviews.py 4099d2c2d00ef2e8fac5369153329dd3de0998c1 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11160/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Brenden Matthews > >
