Ben M,

Thanks for posting this. In the Apache OODT Resource manager and
Workflow Manager we do #1. #2 is kind of ugly (almost like casting
or tagging the object's type); #3 would be good to do anyways, right?

Cheers,
Chris

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: [email protected]
WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++






-----Original Message-----
From: Benjamin Mahler <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, June 13, 2013 12:23 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
Benjamin Hindman <[email protected]>, Vinod Kone <[email protected]>,
Brenden Matthews <[email protected]>
Subject: [DISCUSS] ExecutorID for Command Executors

>Vinod and I had a discussion as a result of Brenden's review:
>https://reviews.apache.org/r/11814
>
>The webui is broken for command executors because the master does not know
>the executor ID for the tasks using a command executor. This is because
>the
>Task protobuf only has the executor_id field, no other field to indicate
>the presence of the command executor.
>
>It seems the slave also doesn't set the Task.executor_id for command
>executors, thus relying on it being optionally set in executorTerminated()
>to determine whether the task used a command executor.
>
>This all seems pretty messy, a few things to consider:
>
>1) Should we simply always set the Task.executor_id for these tasks? The
>master could do so currently, but there would be an implicit contract that
>the slave and master both use the task id as the executor id.
>
>2) We can add a boolean is_command_executor to Task, so that both the
>master and slave can set the field, and the slave can use the boolean in
>executorTerminated() to determine whether the task used a command
>executor.
>
>3) Alternatively, we can add a /frameworks/FID/tasks/TID url format for
>the
>broken links on the master webui, so that we can search for the task in
>the
>slave state to locate its executor.

Reply via email to