> On June 14, 2013, 10:30 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote: > > My only concern here is that if we do want to see the driver's > > (unimportant) messages, we have to bump up the logging to 2. This will spit > > out a lot of log lines from the libprocess. Not sure whats the right > > strategy here though.
I'm happy to move libprocess to VLOG(4) or higher. - Benjamin ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11886/#review21925 ----------------------------------------------------------- On June 14, 2013, 9:22 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/11886/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated June 14, 2013, 9:22 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Vinod Kone. > > > Description > ------- > > Lost this review during the repository migration. This quiets down some of > the logging in sched.cpp by setting the VLOG level based on the importance of > the message. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/sched/sched.cpp 248e12ef4a608256454ee9f90c9c066d442a6d9f > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11886/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Ben Mahler > >
