On 26 March 2014 03:24, Joseph Bonneau <[email protected]> wrote: > *The number of users may be much larger than the number of web domains (100 > M or more), with frequent updates, so running a transparency log is a huge > task, potentially much bigger than CT.
An idea I had to mitigate that (actually for DNSSEC, but applies equally well here) is to allow the global log to delegate to domains that are particularly noisy/large, so they have to run their own logs. BTW, should a scheme emerge for this, I would be very happy to contemplate running a log for gmail.com. _______________________________________________ Messaging mailing list [email protected] https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/messaging
