On 29 March 2014 04:15, Trevor Perrin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> It might be nice if the infrastructure and tools for this existed, so >>> it could be offered to services in a "ready-to-go" form, perhaps some >>> might be tempted to try... >> >> The open source CT code >> (https://code.google.com/p/certificate-transparency/) is already >> partially "pluggable", and we'll be making it more so over time. > > Are there sparse Merkle trees anywhere?
Nope, haven't got round to that part yet, but the code to implement them is in the revocation transparency paper. _______________________________________________ Messaging mailing list [email protected] https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/messaging
