-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 16/04/14 20:24, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 04:36:07PM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote: >> * All members agree about the order of the messages in the chat > > How important is this goal? It might be make things simpler if > this wasn't a hard requirement.
I'm open to the idea of relaxing the goals to make the problem tractable, but I think we'll need some kind of ordering restrictions - otherwise a member could mess with other members' interpretations of the conversation by causing different members to see different orderings. > So the first question I really have, is this 1 master acceptable, > or do you need a multi master solution? > > If you go with 1 master, you can just have that one decide what the > order is, and hand out ids if needed. > > If you're going for multi master, things might get more > complicated, and I'm not sure it's needed. Interesting idea... if we had a single master choosing the order, could we prevent the master from showing different orders to different members? Cheers, Michael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTTuEaAAoJEBEET9GfxSfM7W4IALNqEjMqsisKIj6HkkM8u/OS G32X/0rl3/0TR3vUQsva/bhQHsxYzDPjQGTzV20ggukt2iY6z6Az4x/wKQQ59E5K W/r7+gDKWXbnEWl64c9OUW743xI3qnGqH/Bx0qnT8HUFxmE2+b96OWcns3BIdKhB FQjyXOZT/csVJdkIzQuNbpi5XfJhCRHBJejiLwhCdAwFuRpxK1ItyB0LsrrSf43D agfCHzKe7UoU9blM5xxvGQFwOF4HWQUYNW8w2h8w1uvMvgFv4bX78y4G3aPUpFBv nkClVliUUQo2FJ19EsWKkbR32NyxCC+lnzzduWr6PHwyNVqW2PKIyGwssNLfyC4= =0wPG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Messaging mailing list [email protected] https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/messaging
