On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Trevor Perrin <[email protected]> wrote: > Pond doesn't have a notion of group messages. But if it did, I > imagine they would still have these properties (in particular, I > imagine users would *not* want to reveal to mailbox servers what > groups they are members of, since hiding relationships is the point of > Pond). So if the sender goes offline, there's no-one else who can > re-transmit a lost message.
As a note re Pond: It doesn't do a good job concealing social-network information. In particular, the single-identity-per-client constraint means that any two colluding participants can determine that they're talking to the same person. _______________________________________________ Messaging mailing list [email protected] https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/messaging
