-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2014.12.10 16.31, moderncry...@mkern.fastmail.fm wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014, at 19:56, Mike Hearn wrote: >> I would like to hear opinions on the value of deniability in OTR >> like protocols. >> >> From a privacy perspective the rationale is fairly clear. > > The practical value of deniability at the protocol level would be > much higher if it was deeply integrated into the user interface of > (commonly used) client software.
Under which specific scenario would this improve security outcomes for users? E. - -- Ideas are my favorite toys. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF4EAREIAAYFAlSIv9UACgkQQwkE2RkM0wrK4wD9HiwX1YXesD+cyOM5dWxa/nKY IlyxWp3s6zGtZHJGZhABAKHOlnFGCZMo7fBYr0iNUI64Nx4EjcW8FtpL4XON5UY6 =JESR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Messaging mailing list Messaging@moderncrypto.org https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/messaging
