On 11 February 2015 at 04:46, Mike Hearn <[email protected]> wrote:
> You shouldn't be able to send a mail that's encrypted but not signed, that
> makes little sense.

Do you say that from a political sense or from a technical sense of
the S/MIME spec?  I regularly don't sign my emails for a host of
reasons even though I encrypt them.

A mail header certainly has the issue of a privacy-preserving way of
fetching it, but I find key attachments to be ugly and confusing to
non-users.  I feel like there must be some way in the MIME world to
stash a key somewhere that's hidden from clients but accessible to the
machine.

-tom
_______________________________________________
Messaging mailing list
[email protected]
https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/messaging

Reply via email to