Yes, just to clarify: Remote attestation is clearly a design goal of SGX. I just don't think they've built example code or tools for it yet. I don't think the Linux SDK has even been kept up to date.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Justin King-Lacroix < [email protected]> wrote: > > SGX is a really big step both because Intel has actually issued the > equivalent of endorsement/platform credentials, so it's usable on the open > Internet, and because it measures user-level code, which is what most > applications of RA actually care about. (In fact, the partial isolation of > the enclave code from the OS means the remote party often doesn't need to > care about what OS is running.) > > I'm really not convinced RA is an afterthought for SGX. Intel have been > talking about it from the get-go. > > On 26 August 2015 at 17:20, Steve Weis <[email protected]> wrote: > >> With SGX, remote attestation is possible but seems like an afterthought >> right now. My understanding is that Intel expects someone to write an >> attesting enclave that will handle attesting peer enclaves. I don't know of >> any attestation enclave implementation or tooling around it that exists yet. >> >>
_______________________________________________ Messaging mailing list [email protected] https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/messaging
