Politifact has a better breakdown: http://www.politifact.com/ truth-o-meter/article/2016/oct/23/are-clinton-wikileaks- emails-doctored-or-are-they-/
A few key points: *There is evidence that previous leaks did modify some material *Not all of the emails are signed, so some could be doctored. *DKIM wouldn't prevent doctoring by omission (not leaking some emails) All reporting seems to ignore an (admittedly unlikely) scenario: it's possible that HillaryClinton.com was compromised and the DKIM signing keys were stolen. The story so far is that a few campaign aides had their accounts compromised by spear phishing, but that could be a cover story. If we're to believe this is really a state-level attacker it's by no means beyond belief. Of course, it's a bad look for the Clinton campaign to say the leaks may not be accurate because the breach was actually worse than reported.
_______________________________________________ Messaging mailing list Messaging@moderncrypto.org https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/messaging
