Forward to list because I used the wrong sender address.

--- Begin Message ---
Nadim Kobeissi on Tue, Nov 29 2016:
> * Silent Circle were contacted by Open Whisper Systems and asked to modify
> their implementation, which they ended up renaming to ZINA as a
> consequence, away from LibSalamander ("Zina is Not Axolotl").
> * ChatSecure almost lost their U.S. public funding to implement Signal
> Protocol, until an agreement could be reached regarding whether a totally
> independent implementation could be published on the App Store.
> * Wire claims to have been asked for USD $2.5M for licensing fees for
> Signal Protocol after writing their own implementation, and were forced to
> update their independent implementation with a copyright notice for Open
> Whisper Systems.
> * Some other projects are also claiming that in the past year, before these
> specs were published, they were asked to pay a licensing fee even if they
> intended to independently implement Signal Protocol from scratch.

I'd like to hear what specific claims were made against any of these
projects. Other than software patents, if your jurisdiction even
recognizes such a thing, and specific laws, it's not illegal to
implement a protocol, whether the spec is available or not.

IIRC, Wire was accused of copyright infringement because their
implementation (in a different programming language) looked too similar (!) 
to the OWS Java code. Note that the OWS code as well as Wire are
GPL-licensed, so the dispute was over attribution only! I wonder why
OWS were going after such a case at all.

The ZINA case you mention sounds like a trademark claim for "Signal"?

Anyway, reading such discussions lately, it seems to me that the
propaganda term "intellectual property" has had exactly its desired
effect: fear, uncertainty, and doubt about what anyone is allowed to do
with "someone else's idea".


-SMH

--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Messaging mailing list
Messaging@moderncrypto.org
https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/messaging

Reply via email to