On Tue, 2018-01-16 at 15:12 +0000, Ximin Luo wrote: > I'd guess (contrary to Jeff) that a 3-party DH (e.g. Joux's > pairing-based scheme) would probably improve the matter - you could > probably support non-cooperative (asynchronous) merges of a 3-fork as > long as they all belong in different subtrees. I haven't done the > calculation for this yet though.
I agree: You can merge so long as you occupy a different branch from all other changes not in your past. Joux's 3-way DH scheme ensures has people occupy different branches more frequently. I think merge issues do still damage the device subtree idea though, but not sure anything can improve that. Jeff
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Messaging mailing list Messaging@moderncrypto.org https://moderncrypto.org/mailman/listinfo/messaging
