On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 02:47:00PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 09:56:47AM -0500, Franklin S. Cooper Jr wrote: > > * Currently two versions of Wilink 6 need to be supported. > > * The latest version supports the PG 3 wilink 6 module which is the version > > that > > comes with the am37x-evm and am335x-evm . > > * An older version supports the PG 2 wilink 6 module which is the version > > that > > comes with the am180x-evm. > > * Specifying the PREFERRED_VERSION to match this requirement. > > > > Signed-off-by: Franklin S. Cooper Jr <[email protected]> > > --- > > Version 2 changes: > > None. Apart of new patchset. > > > > meta-arago-distro/conf/distro/arago.conf | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > > 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/meta-arago-distro/conf/distro/arago.conf > > b/meta-arago-distro/conf/distro/arago.conf > > index 9e43ea3..44141c1 100644 > > --- a/meta-arago-distro/conf/distro/arago.conf > > +++ b/meta-arago-distro/conf/distro/arago.conf > > @@ -105,6 +105,23 @@ PREFERRED_VERSION_bluez-hcidump = "2.2" > > PREFERRED_VERSION_bash = "3.2.48" > > PREFERRED_VERSION_gettext = "0.16.1" > > > > +# Support Wilink 6 PG 3 modules > > +PREFERRED_VERSION_ti-compat-bluetooth = "r5.sp3.05" > > +PREFERRED_VERSION_ti-compat-wireless-wl12xx = "r5.sp4.01" > > +PREFERRED_VERSION_wl12xx-firmware = "r5.sp4.01" > > +PREFERRED_VERSION_wpa-supplicant = "r5.sp4.01" > > +PREFERRED_VERSION_hostap-daemon = "r5.sp4.01" > > +PREFERRED_VERSION_ti-wifi-utils = "r5.sp3.05" > > + > > +# Support Wilink 6 PG 2 modules > > +# By default am180x-evms come with an outdated wilink 6 module > > +PREFERRED_VERSION_ti-compat-bluetooth_am180x-evm = "r5.00.18" > > +PREFERRED_VERSION_ti-compat-wireless-wl12xx_am180x-evm = "r5.00.18" > > +PREFERRED_VERSION_wl12xx-firmware_am180x-evm = "r5.00.18" > > +PREFERRED_VERSION_wpa-supplicant_am180x-evm = "r5.00.18" > > +PREFERRED_VERSION_hostap-daemon_am180x-evm = "r5.00.18" > > +PREFERRED_VERSION_ti-wifi-utils_am180x-evm = "r5.00.18" > > Ok, I've been thinking about this versioning model for some time - it's quite > ambiguous and can be a source of all kind of sorting problems. Here you set > preferred versions, which is good for the build. But from a package manager > it's unclear which one is preferred, moreover, if one is a clear upgrade path > for the other, or not... So, basically, there will be problems in the field > with this split and versioning of those packages. But I'm not sure if there's > a better way to handle this exception.
And another potential problem I see is that none of those packages are marked as machine-specific. In case there are other armv5te machines in the build, there will be a conflict between packages... -- Denys _______________________________________________ meta-arago mailing list [email protected] http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago
