>-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] [mailto:meta-arago- >[email protected]] On Behalf Of Cooper Jr., Franklin >Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 10:31 AM >To: Heroor, Siddharth; [email protected] >Subject: Re: [meta-arago] [PATCH 2/2] glsdk: add the initial GLSDK >branding policy > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:meta-arago- >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Heroor, Siddharth >> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 6:03 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [meta-arago] [PATCH 2/2] glsdk: add the initial GLSDK >branding policy >> >> * Choose ti-linux-glsdk as the preferred provider >> >> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Heroor <[email protected]> >> cc: Mrinmayee Hingolikar <[email protected]> >> --- >> .../conf/distro/include/branding-glsdk.inc | 4 ++++ >> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode >100644 meta- >> arago-distro/conf/distro/include/branding-glsdk.inc >> >> diff --git a/meta-arago-distro/conf/distro/include/branding- >glsdk.inc b/meta- >> arago-distro/conf/distro/include/branding-glsdk.inc >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..d1c30f3 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/meta-arago-distro/conf/distro/include/branding-glsdk.inc >> @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ >> +# GLSDK branding configuration >> + >> +# Use the SDK supported kernel and kernel version >> +PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-ti-glsdk" > >I am not familiar with the GLSDK but I am not sure why you need >your own branding include file. This patch shows you want to >change the kernel but this really should be done in meta-ti within >each of the machine configuration files. I will let Denys comment >but if you really can't put this within meta-ti then you should at >least make this statement machine or at least SOC specific. > >Branding-amsdk.inc only exist due to the mainline effort for >am335x. Currently the Sitara team supports am335x on the 3.2 >kernel while the kernel team is working on getting am335x in >mainline. So satisfy both kernels the branding include file was >created.
Another example would be if you want to use QT5 instead of QT4 to set preferred versions and providers for your SDK. > >Unless your team's work falls in a similar situation there isn't a >need to create this file. I personally don't like the branding >include file and plan on getting rid of the amsdk file once we >release a mainline am335x SDK. > >Also I don't see a recipe for linux-ti-glsdk within meta-ti. > >> -- >> 1.7.0.4 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> meta-arago mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago >_______________________________________________ >meta-arago mailing list >[email protected] >http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago _______________________________________________ meta-arago mailing list [email protected] http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago
