> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dmytriyenko, Denys
> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 10:22 AM
> To: Cooper Jr., Franklin
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [meta-arago] [PATCH 3/7] packagegroup-arago-tisdk-qt: Make
> packagegroup generic
> 
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:53:58AM -0600, Franklin S. Cooper Jr wrote:
> > * Update packagegroup so it applies to Qt 5 users along with Qt 4 users.
> > * To reflect this change also rename recipe top reflect that its a generic 
> > qt
> >   packagegroup.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Franklin S. Cooper Jr <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  .../packagegroups/packagegroup-arago-tisdk-qt.bb   |   27
> ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../packagegroups/packagegroup-arago-tisdk-qte.bb  |   19 --------------
> >  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)  create mode
> > 100644
> > meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-arago-tisdk-
> > qt.bb  delete mode 100644
> > meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-arago-tisdk-
> > qte.bb
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-arago-tisd
> > k-qt.bb
> > b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-arago-tisd
> > k-qt.bb
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..c981f9e
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-arago-
> > +++ tisdk-qt.bb
> > @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> > +DESCRIPTION = "Task to add Qt embedded related packages"
> > +LICENSE = "MIT"
> > +PR = "r0"
> > +
> > +inherit packagegroup
> > +
> > +PACKAGE_ARCH = "${MACHINE_ARCH}"
> > +
> > +QT4_DEMOS = "\
> > +    qt4-embedded-examples \
> > +    qt4-embedded-demos \
> > +    ${@base_conditional('ARAGO_QT_PROVIDER', 'qt4-embedded-gles',
> > +'quick-playground', '', d)} \
> 
> BTW, should we drop ARAGO_QT_PROVIDER?
[Franklin] Yeah I think we should. But should we drop QT_PROVIDER and use 
ARAGO_QT_PROVIDER instead since this is Arago specific? Or were you planning on 
pushing that up to meta-qt5?

No matter what choice we make would you want to make this change before this 
patchset, after this patchset or after my remaining Qt 5 patches that I have 
yet to send?
> We now have QT_PROVIDER for qt4 vs qt5 (can possibly extend it to cover qt4-
> gles too) Otherwise, we started using "sgx" in MACHINE_FEATURES to
> determine whether to enable gles or not. 
[Franklin] We would still need to check for sgx in MACHINE_FEATURES since we 
don't have a concept of qt5-gles.
So, if we unify on that, we can drop
> ARAGO_QT_PROVIDER to avoid confusion with QT_PROVIDER.
> 
> 
> > +"
> > +
> > +QT5_DEMOS = "\
> > +    qtwebkit-examples-examples \
> > +"
> > +
> > +QT_DEMOS = "\
> > +    ${@base_conditional('QT_PROVIDER', 'qt5', '${QT5_DEMOS}',
> '${QT4_DEMOS}', d)} \
> > +    qt-tstat \
> > +"
> > +
> > +RDEPENDS_${PN} = "\
> > +    ${@base_conditional('QT_PROVIDER', 'qt5', 'packagegroup-arago-qt5',
> 'packagegroup-arago-qte', d)} \
> > +    ${QT_DEMOS} \
> > +"
> > diff --git
> > a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-arago-tisd
> > k-qte.bb
> > b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-arago-tisd
> > k-qte.bb
> > deleted file mode 100644
> > index 10187a6..0000000
> > ---
> > a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-arago-tisd
> > k-qte.bb
> > +++ /dev/null
> > @@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
> > -DESCRIPTION = "Task to add Qt embedded related packages"
> > -LICENSE = "MIT"
> > -PR = "r4"
> > -
> > -inherit packagegroup
> > -
> > -PACKAGE_ARCH = "${MACHINE_ARCH}"
> > -
> > -QT_DEMOS = "\
> > -    qt4-embedded-examples \
> > -    qt4-embedded-demos \
> > -    qt-tstat \
> > -    ${@base_conditional('ARAGO_QT_PROVIDER', 'qt4-embedded-gles',
> 'quick-playground', '', d)} \
> > -"
> > -
> > -RDEPENDS_${PN} = "\
> > -    packagegroup-arago-qte \
> > -    ${QT_DEMOS} \
> > -"
> > --
> > 1.7.0.4
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > meta-arago mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago
_______________________________________________
meta-arago mailing list
[email protected]
http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago

Reply via email to