On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 09:15:45PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:27:06PM +0000, Cooper Jr., Franklin wrote: > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Tom Rini [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rini, Tom > > > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 2:00 PM > > > To: Cooper Jr., Franklin > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [meta-arago] [PATCH 5/6] mount-sdcard: Update to use new udev > > > entry > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 09:45:20AM -0600, Franklin S. Cooper Jr wrote: > > > > > > > * Patch 1c1b695310309ec3526f1b6b415c5e1b74a567e1 added a udev > > > entry to > > > > automatically mount sd card partition. > > > > * For some reason that udev entry isn't automatically ran. > > > > * As a workaround manually trigger udev to run twice (not sure why thats > > > needed) > > > > for the udev rule to run correctly. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Franklin S. Cooper Jr <[email protected]> > > > > > > This issn't right. Have you added debugging steps to the mount.sh script? > > > We're saying, with this change "lets trigger all block devices 3 times", > > > and on the > > > 3rd attempt we finally do mount things. I've seen some partitions NOT be > > > auto- > > > mounted due to being dirty and needing an fsck prior to mounting them. > > > If we > > > need to do this type of change at the end as a "we can't figure out the > > > root > > > cause, but we need to release", OK. > > > But I don't think we're there yet. Thanks!
> > [Franklin] Just to give an update it looks like fsck is required to be ran > > to fix this problem however it wouldn't be safe to run fsck and let it > > auto fix the problem since that could cause potential issues. So if fsck > > is really the proper solution then I'm not sure that would work for > > something that needs to automatically work at bootup. > > Well, dirty cards shouldn't be auto-mounted. Or there's some option to > mount we should be passing to say "no, it's OK". So, what is the agreement here? I don't think forcing fsck for mounting a card is a good idea. I agree with Tom that if the card is dirty (could be corrupted), then user intervention is required anyway. I'm planning on skipping these 2 patches, if nobody objects. -- Denys _______________________________________________ meta-arago mailing list [email protected] http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago
