Does this mean that a fix for this issue was pushed to mainline?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:meta-arago-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Denys Dmytriyenko
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 12:57 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [meta-arago] [PATCH 17/19] arago.conf: with unification on mainline,
> remove PACKAGE_ARCH logic
> 
> From: Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]>
> ---
>  meta-arago-distro/conf/distro/arago.conf | 9 ---------
>  1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta-arago-distro/conf/distro/arago.conf b/meta-arago-
> distro/conf/distro/arago.conf
> index 7bd1de2..b652fda 100644
> --- a/meta-arago-distro/conf/distro/arago.conf
> +++ b/meta-arago-distro/conf/distro/arago.conf
> @@ -72,12 +72,3 @@ ENTERPRISE_DISTRO = "1"
>  # Arago based SDK. No need to prevent gst-ffmpeg from being used since we
> # disable troublesome software.
>  LICENSE_FLAGS_WHITELIST = "commercial_gst-ffmpeg"
> -
> -# Some machines with the same architecture use different kernel versions.
> -# Set PACKAGE_ARCH to allow packages to be seperated by both architecture
> and -# linux-libc-headers version.
> -PACKAGE_ARCH := "${TUNE_PKGARCH}-${PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-libc-
> headers}"
> -# Need to include the new PACKAGE_ARCH to the PACKAGE_ARCHS variable -
> PACKAGE_ARCHS += "${TUNE_PKGARCH}-${PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-libc-
> headers}"
> -# Adjust some vars accordingly
> -STAGING_BINDIR_TOOLCHAIN =
> "${STAGING_DIR_NATIVE}${bindir_native}/${TUNE_PKGARCH}-
> ${PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-libc-headers}${TARGET_VENDOR}-
> ${TARGET_OS}"
> --
> 2.0.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> meta-arago mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago
_______________________________________________
meta-arago mailing list
[email protected]
http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago

Reply via email to