On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 04:54:08PM -0400, Brian Hutchinson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Cooper Jr., Franklin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Honestly I don't know how many people are still using am18x in the latest > > maintenance branches/master. The last TI SDK that used am18x was based on > > danny. > > If you used oe-layersetup I would also recommend using either the danny > > config or the amsdk-06.00.00.00-config.txt. With that you should be able to > > get something working. > > The last TI supported kernel for am18 is rather old (2.6.37) and I think > > some programs like newer udev had issues with such an old kernel so it > > might take a bit of work to get that working with the latest maintenance > > branches. > > > > The current external Linaro toolchain used in Arago does not support ARM9. > > The Arago toolchain is your best bet. > > > > arago-2011.09 is what I've been using but didn't know if there has > been any update to this. It's not like you can browse > http://downloads.ti.com/sdoemb/sdoemb_public_sw/arago_toolchain to see > what's out there. If you don't know the name you can't get anything > from there.
No, I only made 1 release of the Arago toolchain - 2011.09 that is gcc-4.5 based. Linaro toolchain (and Linaro in general) is not specifically targeting ARM9, but it's still based on upstream GCC and hence should still work and produce code for ARM9... Another option is to use upstream GCC completely, i.e. an internal toolchain from OE-Core. > I've been using 3.12 kernel from davinci with latest rootfs. That will have less problems than 2.6.37, but still prone to issues with the old toolchain. -- Denys _______________________________________________ meta-arago mailing list [email protected] http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago
