FYI I know this patch set says RFC but if it looks good then I think it's ready 
to be committed whenever.


> On Mar 5, 2015, at 1:30 PM, Cooper Jr., Franklin <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>> On Mar 5, 2015, at 1:16 PM, Dmytriyenko, Denys <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 02:07:21PM -0500, Cooper Jr., Franklin wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Mar 5, 2015, at 1:00 PM, Stiffler, Jacob <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> This is needed to the dual-camera-demo, though I'm not sure why exactly. 
>>>> 
>>>> Franklin can you comment on this?
>> 
>>> It's not needed for the dual camera demo it is needed since we don't have a 
>>> version of the Graphics SDK for 335x and am437x that works with 
>>> Wayland/Qtwayland.
>>> 
>>> Sometime "this year" we will have a graphics package for all devices that 
>>> supports Wayland.
>> 
>> Ok, that makes sense. Although there was some experimentation with WSEGL 
>> plugin, but that wasn't very clean and incomplete...
> I agree not my decision....
>> 
>> So, if this is a temporary workaround, I'd like to be less invasive, if 
>> possible. From a higher level configuration, do you plan to stick to Qt5, 
>> but 
>> switch it to eglfs backend, instead of wayland?
> Yes.
>> When GFX for AM3/4 catches up 
>> and wayland is turned back on, will eglfs stay as an option?
> Yes and No. No one will purposely break it but it won't be tested or apart of 
> any sdk once we get the Wayland support we need.
> 
> It would be good for your team to stick with Wayland which is why we limited 
> he change inside of our branding file. We then can still flesh out those 
> touch issues and insure it's in a good place when we get the proper graphics 
> sdk.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Denys
>> 
>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Dmytriyenko, Denys 
>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 1:58 PM
>>>> To: Stiffler, Jacob
>>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Re: [meta-arago] [RFC v2 0/4] Add WAYLAND_SUPPORT flag.
>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 01:31:39PM -0500, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
>>>>> * This falg may be used to exclude wayland/weston from the file system.
>>>>> * QT platform will be set based on this value.
>>>>> * Add processor-sdk band to disable wayland for ti33x and ti43x.
>>>> 
>>>> So, what's the future of wayland in SDKs, then?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Jacob Stiffler (4):
>>>>> arago-prefs: Add WAYLAND_SUPPORT flag.
>>>>> packagegroups: Implement WAYLAND_SUPPORT flag.
>>>>> qtbase: Set qpa based in WAYLAND_SUPPORT flag.
>>>>> branding-processor-sdk: Add processor-sdk brand.
>>>>> 
>>>>> .../conf/distro/include/arago-prefs.inc            |    2 ++
>>>>> .../conf/distro/include/branding-processor-sdk.inc |   34 
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> .../packagegroups/packagegroup-arago-qte.bb        |    4 +--
>>>>> .../packagegroup-arago-tisdk-graphics.bb           |    4 +--
>>>>> .../packagegroups/packagegroup-arago-tisdk-qte.bb  |    4 +--
>>>>> .../packagegroups/packagegroup-linaro-tc-test.bb   |    5 +--
>>>>> meta-arago-distro/recipes-qt/qt5/qtbase/qt_env.sh  |    1 -
>>>>> .../recipes-qt/qt5/qtbase_5.4.1.bbappend           |    9 ++++--
>>>>> 8 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)  create mode 
>>>>> 100644 
>>>>> meta-arago-distro/conf/distro/include/branding-processor-sdk.inc
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> 1.7.9.5
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> meta-arago mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago
> _______________________________________________
> meta-arago mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago
_______________________________________________
meta-arago mailing list
[email protected]
http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago

Reply via email to