Ok, thanks for the clarification. Will use thud branch On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, 10:20 a.m. Denys Dmytriyenko, <[email protected]> wrote:
> No, <release>-next branches are used across many OpenEmbedded/Yocto layers > exactly the same - for testing changes to that release branch. > > Denys > > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 08:15:41AM +1200, Ankur Tyagi wrote: > > Thanks Denys. > > > > Should I start with thud or thud-next? > > Is thud-next for next milestone release?. > > > > Regards > > Ankur > > > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, 5:15 a.m. Denys Dmytriyenko, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > No plans for warrior - we are on a single LTS per year schedule, > picking > > > up > > > only Fall even releases and skipping Spring odd ones. > > > > > > Denys > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 08:14:21AM +1200, Ankur Tyagi wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > We are planning to upgrade arago distro in our product. > > > > At this point, I can only see thud branch in meta-arago whereas > warrior > > > is > > > > available in oe-core. > > > > > > > > Is there any plan for warrior in meta-arago or is it being skipped? > > > > What is the difference between thud and thud-next? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Ankur > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > meta-arago mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ meta-arago mailing list [email protected] http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago
