On 11/2/20 6:05 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 04:53:56PM -0600, Suman Anna wrote: >> Hi Dan, >> >> On 11/2/20 4:18 PM, Dan Murphy wrote: >>> Suman >>> >>> On 10/27/20 2:11 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: >>>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 09:37:18AM -0500, Suman Anna wrote: >>>>> Hi Denys, >>>>> >>>>> On 10/26/20 11:08 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 09:48:26PM -0500, Suman Anna wrote: >>>>>>> On 10/26/20 9:45 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: >>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 09:41:12PM -0500, Suman Anna wrote: >>>>>>>>> Add the ti-rpmsg-char dev packages to make the public headers >>>>>>>>> available in >>>>>>>>> the target fileystem so that applications can be compiled natively on >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> target. >>>>>>>> -sdk-target is not for the target filesystem! >>>>>>>> It is for the target sysroot in the devkit. >>>>>>> Hmm, is this supposed to go into a different file or my patch >>>>>>> description >>>>>>> needs >>>>>>> correcting? >>>>>> It depends on what you actually need. >>>>> I want the files from the ti-rpmsg-char-dev package (the public header >>>>> files >>>>> and libti_rpmsg_char.so) to be part of the FS tarball. >>>> Then you need to pull corresponding -dev package into the packagegroup that >>>> builds up the rootfs. >>>> >>>> At least in Arago, I kept the namespace convention that -sdk-target and >>>> -sdk-host suffixes are used to identify packagegroups for the devkit - >>>> cross-compile development environment on the host, target and host >>>> sysroots. >>>> >>>>> regards >>>>> Suman >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> .../packagegroup-arago-tisdk-addons-sdk-target.bb | 8 >>>>>>>>> ++++++-- >>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> diff --git >>>>>>>>> a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-arago-tisdk-addons-sdk-target.bb >>>>>>>>> b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-arago-tisdk-addons-sdk-target.bb >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> index e372dd67744e..b55c79a4d4df 100644 >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-arago-tisdk-addons-sdk-target.bb >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +++ >>>>>>>>> b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-arago-tisdk-addons-sdk-target.bb >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ >>>>>>>>> DESCRIPTION = "Task to install headers and libraries related to >>>>>>>>> addons >>>>>>>>> into the SDK" >>>>>>>>> LICENSE = "MIT" >>>>>>>>> -PR = "r43" >>>>>>>>> +PR = "r44" >>>>>>>>> PACKAGE_ARCH = "${MACHINE_ARCH}" >>>>>>>>> @@ -143,7 +143,11 @@ UTILS_append_dra7xx = " can-utils-dev \ >>>>>>>>> elfutils-staticdev \ >>>>>>>>> " >>>>>>>>> UTILS_append_k2g = " can-utils-dev" >>>>>>>>> -UTILS_append_k3 = " can-utils-dev" >>>>>>>>> +UTILS_append_k3 = "\ >>>>>>>>> + can-utils-dev \ >>>>>>>>> + ti-rpmsg-char-dev \ >>>>>>>>> + ti-rpmsg-char-staticdev \ >>>>>>>>> +" >>>>>>>>> EXTRA_LIBS = "" >>>>>>>>> EXTRA_LIBS_append_ti43x = "\ >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> 2.28.0 >>>>>>>>> >>> >>> Does this need to go in or are you going to send in v2? >> >> I am confused by the terminology above, I am not sure if I need to move this >> to >> the packagegroup-arago-tisdk-addons.bb file, or if this is just a question of >> writing the proper patch description. I cannot verify myself until I fix my >> OE >> build issues. > > Suman, > > If you do need these development packages on the target rootfs, then you do > need to add them to packagegroup-arago-tisdk-addons.bb > > But if you need them to be part of the devkit (cross-compile development > environment on the host), then you need to add to the corresponding > packagegroup-arago-tisdk-addons-sdk-target.bb > > In other words, do you expect someone to compile natively on the target > against your library and headers? Then it's the first one. But, enabling > native development environment on the target should not be decided lightly. > As a matter of fact, for 7.0 we removed this from the default rootfs, > expecting users to be able to add it optionally from package feeds. Though > public package feeds were not ready and got postponed... > > So, my point is - what are you trying to achieve here? Why do you need -dev > package on the target filesystem? If you are trying to enable other > developers > to build apps against your library, could they just write a recipe? Is it > really necessary for the default rootfs? Anyway, hopefully these questions > could guide you towards the proper solution. Please let me know if you still > have questions :) >
Thanks for the explanation Denys. The ask is to be able to compile on the target, believe for some Vision Apps. Lucas, Can you confirm/clarify the need/usage exactly? regards Suman _______________________________________________ meta-arago mailing list [email protected] http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago
