On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 02:13:09PM -0500, Bajjuri, Praneeth wrote:
> 
> 
> On 3/16/2021 1:45 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 12:18:01PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> >>On 12:08-20210316, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> >>
> >>I have no idea what ate up my $subject -> I intended to add "Move to
> >>dunfell/dunfell-tip from upstream.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>This brings arago-config and arago-next-config both in sync with latest
> >>>dunfell and dunfell-next tips appropriately.
> >>>
> >>>This series obviously will need to be followed up at an appropriate time
> >>>with a stable commit sha patch to pin things up.
> >>
> >>K, I might be missing the motivation here - the pinning may not be
> >>required given that dunfell is always a rolling config.. and used only
> >>in the cases of exceptions.. So, please ignore my comment.
> >
> >Looks good to me.
> >
> >Praneeth, I see you only merged one of two patches?
> 
> Yes , only pulled the dunfell-next config .. started the build job
> to check if builds are ok. Will pull the dunfell patch in couple of
> hrs.

Ok, thanks.
_______________________________________________
meta-arago mailing list
[email protected]
http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago

Reply via email to