On 8/27/2021 5:54 AM, Vigna Raja Priya N S wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 1:42 AM Praneeth Bajjuri <[email protected]> wrote:
On 8/26/21 5:31 AM, Priya N S wrote:
Signed-off-by: Priya N S <[email protected]>
---
Hi All,
This patch adds the processor-sdk-07.03.00.005-config for the AM335x
and AM437x 07.03 release.
Changes made in the V3 patch:
* This corresponds to the 07.03 release for the am335x-evm and
am437x-evm platforms.
* The meta-linaro meta-layer is removed because the meta-optee needed
for the build is moved to meta-arm from the dunfell.
any version change log should be below
---
please correct the commit message about "Changes made in the V3 patch:"
.../processor-sdk-07.03.00.005-config.txt | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
configs/processor-sdk/processor-sdk-07.03.00.005-config.txt
diff --git a/configs/processor-sdk/processor-sdk-07.03.00.005-config.txt
b/configs/processor-sdk/processor-sdk-07.03.00.005-config.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..548e759
--- /dev/null
+++ b/configs/processor-sdk/processor-sdk-07.03.00.005-config.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+# This file takes repo entries in the format
+# repo name,repo uri,repo branch,repo commit[,layers=layer1:layer2...:layern]
+
+bitbake,git://git.openembedded.org/bitbake,1.46,017a39ed05d065bf28fd38f91bcde8a098300551
+meta-processor-sdk,git://git.ti.com/processor-sdk/meta-processor-sdk.git,dunfell,c467012684e57c914c4070238987e931f329da15,layers=
this doesnt seems to be latest commit from
https://git.ti.com/cgit/processor-sdk/meta-processor-sdk/log/?h=dunfell
it looks atleast 27 patches behind. Please provide the reason for this
difference.
The release config file added in this patch is for the AM335x and
AM437x GP EVM 07.03.00.005 release that has
already happened on 24th May 2021 and 02nd July 2021. The config file
was missed to add in the oe-layersetup
repository after the release.
The 27 patches mentioned were added after the release of AM335x and
AM437x GP EVM. So, this is the reason
for seeing the differences in the commit Ids.
Can you also start using tags for meta-processor-sdk.
Since 07.03 release has already happened,
Yes, but you can still tag the right commitID eventhough its not on the
top and update the oelayersup patch to point to tagname instead.
We will loose history and dont have a read point later to demystify why
we are using a older commit for the snapshot config patch after a month.
we will consider using the
tags in meta-processor-sdk for the
upcoming releases.
Please suggest.
+meta-arago,git://arago-project.org/git/meta-arago.git,dunfell,07.03.00.005,layers=meta-arago-distro:meta-arago-extras
+meta-qt5,git://github.com/meta-qt5/meta-qt5.git,dunfell,b4d24d70aca75791902df5cd59a4f4a54aa4a125,layers=
+meta-virtualization,git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-virtualization,dunfell,89abc62b47f6f20db9d00a8ec9b2c1b6b60ac3f9,layers=
+meta-openembedded,git://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded,dunfell,389757a7494221fea1d8437e9a01c6e4fb4700af,layers=meta-networking:meta-python:meta-oe:meta-gnome:meta-filesystems
+meta-ti,git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-ti,dunfell,07.03.00.005,layers=
+meta-arm,git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-arm,dunfell,c4f04f3fb66f8f4365b08b553af8206372e90a63,layers=meta-arm:meta-arm-toolchain
+oe-core,git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core,dunfell,707036d4ec12ef1a260adcef78627b26e32e6540,layers=meta
+OECORELAYERCONF=./sample-files/bblayers.conf.sample
+OECORELOCALCONF=./sample-files/local-processor-sdk-64.conf.sample
_______________________________________________
meta-arago mailing list
[email protected]
http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago
