On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 10:39:00AM -0500, Andrew Davis via
lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> HS builds do not generate a -${MACHINE} version of the u-boot.img binary.
> Not sure why we deploy these named this way to begin with, maybe a left-
> over from when we had multiple machines per SDK.. To fix the HS builds
> lets ship the binary named as-is for all platforms.
This could potentially mess up with the way Processor SDK (installer, setup
scripts, etc.) expects U-boot binary to be called. I.e. the stuff outside of
CoreSDK and the Yocto build... But I'm not sure, just speculating here.
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <[email protected]>
> ---
> meta-arago-distro/classes/tisdk-bundle.bbclass | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta-arago-distro/classes/tisdk-bundle.bbclass
> b/meta-arago-distro/classes/tisdk-bundle.bbclass
> index 7e3f4c26..9e961e1b 100644
> --- a/meta-arago-distro/classes/tisdk-bundle.bbclass
> +++ b/meta-arago-distro/classes/tisdk-bundle.bbclass
> @@ -777,9 +777,9 @@ tisdk_image_build () {
> fi
>
> # Copy the U-Boot image if it exists
> - if [ -e ${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/u-boot-${MACHINE}.img ]
> + if [ -e ${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/u-boot.img ]
> then
> - cp ${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/u-boot-${MACHINE}.img ${prebuilt_dir}/
> + cp ${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/u-boot.img ${prebuilt_dir}/
> elif [ -e ${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/u-boot-${MACHINE}.bin ]
> then
> cp ${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/u-boot-${MACHINE}.bin ${prebuilt_dir}/
> --
> 2.36.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#13913):
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-arago/message/13913
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/91902516/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-arago/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
