On 11/20/2025 10:09 AM, Andrew Davis wrote:
On 11/19/25 3:52 PM, Ryan Eatmon via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
Based on the git repo, the latest tag was v0.6.1 and then some
additional commits in git.  So tag the current PV to 0.6.1+git.

Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <[email protected]>
---
  meta-arago-extras/recipes-multimedia/nnshark/nnshark_git.bb | 2 ++
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/meta-arago-extras/recipes-multimedia/nnshark/nnshark_git.bb b/meta-arago-extras/recipes-multimedia/nnshark/nnshark_git.bb
index 505aaa4c..89be15f5 100644
--- a/meta-arago-extras/recipes-multimedia/nnshark/nnshark_git.bb
+++ b/meta-arago-extras/recipes-multimedia/nnshark/nnshark_git.bb
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ LICENSE = "GPL-2.0-only & LGPL-2.1-only"
  LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=e1caa368743492879002ad032445fa97 \ file://COPYING.LESSER;md5=66c40c88533cd228b5b85936709801c8"
+PV = "0.6.1+git"
+

That tag was 6 years ago, same issue for Coremark in that other thread,
seems some projects just gave up on doing tagged releases. I wonder at
what point the "version" stops making sense and we should fallback to
only the git sha? Oh well, problem for another time,

Generally I would agree, but if the tag was six years ago and the last commit was three years ago... So all in all it feels like a dead project.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Davis <[email protected]>

  SRC_URI = "git://github.com/nnstreamer/nnshark.git;protocol=https;branch=master;name=nnshark \ git://github.com/GStreamer/common.git;protocol=https;branch=master;name=common;subdir=${S}/common \
  "


--
Ryan Eatmon                [email protected]
-----------------------------------------
Texas Instruments, Inc.  -  LCPD  -  MGTS


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#16816): 
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-arago/message/16816
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/116382044/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-arago/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to