Yashpal, Does openssl-1.0.0j meet our requirement? This is the version in recent Yocto.
If above version doesn't work, we should upgrade openssl to 1.0.1c for Yocto. Anyway, those recipes shouldn't reside in meta-fsl-ppc layer. Best Regards, Zhenhua > -----Original Message----- > From: McClintock Matthew-B29882 > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 7:14 AM > To: Luo Zhenhua-B19537 > Cc: [email protected]; McClintock Matthew-B29882; Liu Ting- > B28495; Guo Chunrong-B40290; Luo Zhenhua-B19537 > Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-ppc 33/42] openssl: add 1.0.1c > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:51 AM, Zhenhua Luo <[email protected]> > wrote: > > From: Zhenhua Luo <[email protected]> > > > > the patch is generated based on > http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/36331/ > > which is creatd by Constantin Musca <[email protected]> > > > > recreate man-section.patch to fix apply error > > > > old man-section.patch can't be applied applied on some Linux > distros, > > CentOS 5.5, Redhat 5 etc. following is the error: > > Applying patch man-section.patch > > patching file Makefile.org > > Hunk #1 succeeded at 160 (offset 26 lines). > > Hunk #2 succeeded at 626 (offset 19 lines). > > misordered hunks! output would be garbled Hunk #3 FAILED at 633. > > Do we really want to carry our own version of openssl? > > -M _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
