On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Daiane Angolini <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/18/2013 04:58 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> >> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Daiane Angolini >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 04/18/2013 03:59 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Provides a new linux-fslc.inc file which abstracts the specific >>>> changes for the linux-fslc based kernels. A new variable has been add >>>> to linux-imx.inc to allow to skip the 'imx-test' specific hacks after >>>> kernel install as 'imx-test' is not supported for Linux mainline. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> >>>> --- >>> >>> >>> I understand what you did, but it's not yet a common place for both >>> kernel >>> recipes. >>> >>> If it is needed for *any* kernel, poky is wrong in not providing this for >>> *any* kernel. >> >> >> Usually kernel would do the right thing but not in our case. Some >> entry point are even not in the kernel code from FSL branch. > > > I would accept this argument if we only faced this problem with FSL kernel. > > But, as we faced exactly the same with kernel mainline, I can't accept that. > > If kernel mainline is wrong, we must fix it.
mainline this is even worse as it is multi SOC vendor so we do need to pass it. Eric is right and if you check FSL kernel, it doesn't know the MX6SL entry point in the makefile, for example. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
