On 04/22/2013 09:01 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Daiane Angolini
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 04/22/2013 08:43 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
This features the following updates:
* Merge of 3.8.8 stable release
* Fix for i.MX233 OlinuXino MMC boot
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <[email protected]>
---
recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.8.bb | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.8.bb
b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.8.bb
index 68fa8e1..de39564 100644
--- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.8.bb
+++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.8.bb
@@ -4,9 +4,9 @@
include linux-fslc.inc
PV = "3.8+git${SRCPV}"
-PR = "r5"
+PR = "r6"
Why some recipes you bump PR and some other you do not?
Auto pilot! :-) This PR bump can be removed.
# patches-3.8
-SRCREV = "9674b8d96fca62bc47be48fd857591dcfca874b1"
+SRCREV = "7fd77a4db4dc59f98a7118fdbbf02d82b03de1de"
COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(mxs|mx3|mx5|mx6)"
Will you keep "mxs" as compatible machine? (instead of mx28 and mx23, I
mean)
This works for both so 'mxs' is the shortest variation of it. I see no
reason to replace 'mxs' to 'mx23:mx28' when the support is for both
SoCs.
What do you think?
I completely agree.
My intend was to make it clean and explicit for everyone.
--
Daiane
_______________________________________________
meta-freescale mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
