My apologies, Eric. I misread your email the first time.
I'm trying a clean build now with master-next, but I'm having dependency issues. As soon as I fix this I'll look into glimagesink. On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Eric Nelson <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Rogerio, > > > On 07/29/2013 07:35 AM, Rogerio Nunes wrote: >> >> Hi Eric, >> >> I've been usually working without X, so don't know much about glimagesink. >> I have some comments about bitbuck branches bellow. >> > > Note that my testing was also without X. > >> On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Eric Nelson >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> <snip> > >>> >>> >>> By the way, the attached patch is against branch fsl-0.10 >>> in the Bitbucket tree, which appears to match up with the >>> Yocto build, but I notice that Jeremy has a patch applied >>> in the Yocto-0.10. >>> >>> Is 'fsl-0.10' the right baseline to use for future work? >> >> >> fsl-0.10 - branch with "as is" code from fsl BSPs. >> >> yocto-0.10 - branch with patch(es) from the poky layer >> >> 0.10 - branch to merge fsl-0.10, yocto-0.10, upstream-0.10 and to >> refactor the code to port to master (still ongoing) >> > > That's good to know. > > Regards, > > > Eric > _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
