Le Tue, 24 Sep 2013 15:26:22 -0300, Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> > What is the cost on the build/parse time to have this code running > >> > dynamicaly ? > >> > > >> > While at it : why does qt4 depends on virtual/kernel ? > >> > That's quite annoying as it seems qt gets rebuilt everytime we make a > >> > change to the kernel. > >> > >> It uses kernel headers and do syscalls for mxcfb. I am open for an > >> advise how to make this better. > >> > > maybe we could include the linux/mxcfb.h in the patch as these 2 > > ioctls and the 2 struct have little chance to change ? > > The problem here is it is included in the kernel. Can you submit a bug > in bugzilla about this? So I can use this to collect the information. > > We have this in more places, not just Qt, and it'd help a lot so I > will try to think on a generic solution for this. > why not having a mxc-header package built from the generic Freescale kernel so that the software depending on the headers are not impacted by any kernel change ?
Eric _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
