On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:34 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Otavio Salvador >> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 1:14 PM >> To: Angolini Daiane-B19406 >> Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List >> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH v3 00/11] Freescale >> 3.10.17-1.0.0-beta - part 1 >> >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 12:55 PM, [email protected] >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:meta-freescale- >> >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Daiane Angolini >> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 10:17 AM >> >> To: Otavio Salvador >> >> Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List >> >> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH v3 00/11] >> >> Freescale 3.10.17-1.0.0-beta - part 1 >> >> >> >> On 07-02-2014 10:41, [email protected] wrote: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >> >> >> On Behalf Of Otavio Salvador >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 7:14 PM >> >> >> To: Angolini Daiane-B19406 >> >> >> Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List >> >> >> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH v3 00/11] >> >> >> Freescale 3.10.17-1.0.0-beta - part 1 >> >> >> >> >> >> Hello Daiane, >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Daiane Angolini >> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> On 27-01-2014 16:35, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> >> >>>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Daiane Angolini >> >> >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> On 23-01-2014 23:47, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> I did some small fixes that I found during test at O.S. Systems' >> >> >>>>>> autobuilder and I dropped some fixes that were pushed to >> >> >>>>>> master (as you've probably noticed from the e-mail to the mailing >> list). >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> I am awaiting people's feedback for the patches as this >> >> >>>>>> upgrades package versions and we should have a better test >> coverage. >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Please give a try in the 'master-next' branch and comment in >> >> >>>>>> anything that could be improved in the patches. All comments >> >> >>>>>> are >> >> >> welcome... >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> I tested imx-text and vpu integration on imx53qsb and it's OK. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> X11 is up and running on imx53qsb as well. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Tomorrow morning I'm going to test imx28evk and more >> >> >>>>> videos/audios on imx53qsb. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> As soon as I have my test result I let you know. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Awesome; thanks for testing. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> I tested imx28evk and imx53qsb, imx-test, and MM packages. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> For imx-test, I think both board had it integrated. So imx-test >> >> >>> is OK >> >> >>> >> >> >>> For MM packages, I tested the following files: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> BigBillBroonzy-BabyPleaseDontGo1.mp3 >> >> >>> StarWars_eps1_4.451mbps_30fps_720_L3B2_cut.avi >> >> >>> big_buck_bunny_1080p_h264.mov >> >> >>> terminator3_mpeg4_480x280_24fps_aac_stereo_48khz_1min_47sec.mp4 >> >> >>> >> >> >>> All files worked (audio/audio+video+1080pHDMI display) very well >> >> >>> on imx53qsb The mp3 worked very well on imx28evk All movie failed >> >> >>> on imx28evk with "Illegal Instruction". I'm still debugging this. >> >> >> >> >> >> Did you found what is the culprit? >> >> > >> >> > No I haven´t had time to work on this so far. Sorry. No updates. >> >> >> >> I was able to find the commit that introduced the error: >> >> >> >> bb62895 libfslparser: Update to 3.0.9 >> >> >> >> So, master is broken now. Reverting bb62895 the error is gone. >> > >> > This error was fixed internally and it´s going to be part of next >> release. >> >> Great; in this case I think we can merge the VPU patches into master and if >> it proves to work fine into Dora later. As this error is already known in >> Dora as well. >> >> Do you have any objection? > > No, I don´t have objection. > > When I tested the next release I used exactly the same recipe. So it would be > only > md5sum and package itself. > > I think it may help us with the overall upstream process, as we can merge the > VPU > patchset and eliminate this from our staging area...
Applied. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
