> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:meta-freescale- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Otavio Salvador > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 12:46 AM > To: Daiane Angolini > Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List > Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm PATCH 13/16] linux-mfgtool.inc: > Build a Manufactoring Tool variant > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Daiane Angolini <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Otavio Salvador > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This makes a separated binary set for Manufacturing Tool use without > >> clobbering the Linux Kernel used for normal use. > > > > I don´t understand the script enough to comment. > > > > We must elaborate a way to document a how-to for mfgtools. Maybe, we > > should only add a comment on commit log (for example, for kernel > > recipe and u-boot recipe) showing where the deliverable from this > > recipe is placed, and what should I copy to mfg-tools dir tree in > > order to get it working. > > > > Not a mfg-tools related how-to, only a guide for the generated files. > > > > Please, let me know what you think, > > I extended the commitlog for v2 describing the image goal. The doc is > indeed need but we can look at it later as this patchset is to build those > artifacts.
I absolutely agree Daiane > > -- > Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems > http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br > Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 > _______________________________________________ > meta-freescale mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale > _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
