Hi Otavio, On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: > Hello Rogerio, > > First I'd like to thank you for this work. I know how much thinking > and work is needed to a nice patchset and flexible set of > packagegroups and images. > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:03 AM, <ronu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> From: Rogerio Nunes <rogerio.nu...@freescale.com> >> >> This patchset makes some more additions and changes to the packagegroups >> and images in this layer. >> >> Three new images are introduced: >> >> fsl-image-multimedia - A console-only image that includes gstreamer packages >> and Freescale's multimedia packages (VPU and GPU) when available. >> >> fsl-image-multimedia-full - This image has all the packages that >> fsl-image-multimedia has plus all gstreamer's plugins from base, good and >> bad packages. >> >> fsl-image-machine-test - This image has all the packages that >> fsl-multimedia-full has plus test and benchmark applications. >> This image is intended for machine test as the name indicates, >> so no development tools are included. >> >> To support these images, new packagegroups are also created, and old >> packagegroups slightly modified. The legacy image recipes (fsl-image-gui and >> fsl-image-test) are adpated to the new packagegroups structure, so that >> they generate rootfs images that include at least same tools as before. >> >> This patchset also replaces vivante-gpu-sdk by fsl-gpu-sdk. >> >> Known issue: >> fsl-image-machine-test fails to build without x11, because mesa-demos and >> piglit currently depend on it, and are unconditionally included with the >> tools-testapps image feature from poky. This needs to be fixed at poky. > > Good remark. I also think we ought to plan to drop the old images when > those are complete. The proposed images provides a much better set of > features and are faster to build (due its focus in the really need > packages) so I think it'd be a good goal for near future.
Agree. Step 3 of the refactoring yet to come :). > > I think the changes you have to do are minimal and Daiane has provided > a good review on those; it would be good if you could prepare a v2 to > address those and then we can get it merged in master-next for > testing. > > What do you think? > Sounds good. V2 sent. Thanks for the comments guys. > -- > Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems > http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br > Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale