On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Otavio Salvador <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Diego Sueiro <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Carlos Rafael Giani < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> I wasn't planning on doing that, instead I planned on cubox-i support > >> being part of a meta-fsl-arm release for the upcoming Yocto 1.7. > >> But nothing speaks against your patches, at least not from my end. I > just > >> never tested it with dora. How much did you have to modify the recipes > for > >> dora? > > > > > > I've just checked out the recipes and conf files from master branch to > > dora-next branch without any modifications. > > I did not have a chance to make a runtime test, as soon as I get it done > > I'll keep you informed. > > I think we are too close of 1.6 release to go over this. The addition > of a new board imply several things (more build tests, release notes > update and like) and we are too close of next version for it to be > justifiable. > I understand your point. Since I must have to use dora branch, it's not critical to me to maintain it internally. > Another point is that I doubt it will work. Dora has Vivante GPU > 4.6.9p12 (from alpha release) while Daisy has Vivante GPU 4.6.9p13 > (from beta release) and the Cubox kernel uses the last. So you'll get > a segfault in Xorg ;-) I'm building xmbc-image which technically does not depends on X11. Crossed fingers. Regards, -- *dS Diego Sueiro Administrador do Embarcados www.embarcados.com.br<http://www.embarcados.com.br/?utm_source=assinatura_diego&utm_medium=e-mail&utm_campaign=Assinatura%20Email%20Diego> /*long live rock 'n roll*/
-- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
