Thanks Jacob, On 06/20/2014 09:03 AM, Jacob Kroon wrote: > Forgot to cc mailing list. >
And I followed your lead ;) > /Jacob > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: *Jacob Kroon* <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Date: Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 6:01 PM > Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] Adding -rt support for kernel > To: Eric Nelson <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > Hi Eric, > > On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Eric Nelson > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Based on some customer requests, we've applied the "-rt" patches > to our kernel trees and pushed branches like this to our Github > tree: > > > https://github.com/boundarydevices/linux-imx6/tree/boundary-imx_3.10.17_1.0.0_ga-rt > > This makes it pretty simple for someone who's used git to build > these kernels outside of Yocto, but is painful for integration > into a Yocto-based build. > > For the "linux-imx" kernel, the package "linux-imx-rt" recipe > defines a new variant of the kernel, but I don't understand how > this can be used in a build. > > In other words, do you specify > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel="linux-imx-rt" > or > PREFERRED_VERSION_virtual/kernel_linux-imx="rt-3.10.17" > > Please advise, > > > For using the real-time patched kernel, I have > > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel_mx6 = "linux-imx-rt" > > in my distro.conf, but plain > > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-imx-rt" > > should work just aswell. Is this not working for you ? > I haven't tried it. I'm just trying to understand in order to provide a similar "linux-boundary-rt". I think this gives me enough to go on. Regards, Eric -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
