The v2 openssl recipes were sent out to use the rebased patches, those patches 
are generated based on opensource openssl-1.0.1g-stable branch. 

I don't see any comment on the patch series, I will merge them to ensure sec 
function can work in meta-fsl-ppc master. 

Hopefully those FSL openssl patches can be upstreamed ASAP, we can reuse the 
recipes provided by poky directly. I always believe upstream is the right thing 
to do. 


Best Regards,

Zhenhua

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:meta-freescale-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 9:42 PM
> To: Otavio Salvador
> Cc: [email protected]; Schmitt Richard-B43082
> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH 1/4] cryptodev-
> linux/module: use fsl maintained source
> 
> > Is it possible to "rebase" the patches and include them in the recipe?
> > In case it is not and we do need a fork it is better to use
> > cryptodev-linux-fsl-ppc and cryptodev-module-fsl-ppc recipes to make
> > clear it is a fork.
> []
> I've tried a quick rebase and got back all the conflicts I already fixed
> on the merge. I'd prefer not to do them again, especially since we want
> to obsolete them with the upstream.
> If you have an alternative for the time being, then I'm OK with it.
> 
> Cristian S.
> --
> _______________________________________________
> meta-freescale mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
-- 
_______________________________________________
meta-freescale mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale

Reply via email to