On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Andreas, > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Andreas Müller > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Andreas Müller >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Do you think it works out of box doing this change? >>>> >> Ok I updated to current meta-fsl-arm and would like to come back to this: >> >> The patch I send appended packagegroup-qt5-toolchain-target so that >> GL/GLES headers were installed on the target. I've found this >> necessity when testing the qt-creator patches for meta-qt5: To compile >> and debug my sample projects, the headers were required. > > Yes, I understood it. > >> After building latest imx-gpu-viv I don't understand your suggestion - >> maybe it was based on old gpu-viv-bin-mx6q or I misunderstand >> something. > > Yes it was but it should be the same in imx-gpu-viv... > >> With current meta-fsl master the -dev packages look good to >> me and I would simply append ALL dev-packages to >> packagegroup-qt5-toolchain-target. The only contents added to image >> are includes and pkg-config so there should be no harm. >> >> What do you think? > > I agree with the goal but you raised a point. Is it good to have the > -dev packages split along subpackages? > > I am starting to think it is not worth it. The packaging is way more > simple if we merge the -dev packages all together and to be honest > from support point of view it simplifies things as well. > > Anyone wishing to do development is aware more resources are need. If > this is a sysroot of a SDK this is not an issue but is it an issue for > in-target development? > Aahh I see so one -dev for all - like others do.
Coming back to my patch: For reasons I don't look though currently (OK - I moved from dizzy to master for oe-core/meta-oe), compiling/debugging on target with IMAGE_FEATURES += "dev-pkgs dbg-pkgs" works fine without this patch. The GL/GLES headers are all there. I think this patch would have wiped away things going wrong elsewhere - so I suggest to forget it. Andreas -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
