Hello Neena,

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Neena Busireddy
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> From: Lauren Post <[email protected]>
>> Remove pc files now they are part of imx-gpu-viv package Fix api trace
>> installation
>>
>> Change-Id: I95b35b73a249b3e80b7437f3d516e19bc3e1242c
>> Signed-off-by: Lauren Post <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <[email protected]>
>
> I got following error under our autobuilder:
>
> framebuffer fsl-image-machine-test@imx6qsabresd (4/7) Log data follows:
> framebuffer fsl-image-machine-test@imx6qsabresd (4/7) | DEBUG:
> Executing shell function do_install
> framebuffer fsl-image-machine-test@imx6qsabresd (4/7) | rm: cannot remove 
> `.../build-framebuffer/tmp/work/cortexa9hf-vfp-neon-mx6qdl-poky-linux-gnueabi/imx-gpu-viv/1_5.0.11.p4.4-hfp-r0/image/usr/bin/glretrace':
> No such file or directory
> framebuffer fsl-image-machine-test@imx6qsabresd (4/7) | WARNING: exit code 1 
> from a shell command.
> framebuffer fsl-image-machine-test@imx6qsabresd (4/7) | ERROR:
> Function failed: do_install (log file is located at
> .../build-framebuffer/tmp/work/cortexa9hf-vfp-neon-mx6qdl-poky-linux-gnueabi/imx-gpu-viv/1_5.0.11.p4.4-hfp-r0/temp/log.do_install.26744)
> framebuffer fsl-image-machine-test@imx6qsabresd (4/7) recipe
> imx-gpu-viv-1_5.0.11.p4.4-hfp-r0: task do_install: Failed framebuffer 
> fsl-image-machine-test@imx6qsabresd (4/7) ERROR: Task 1452 
> (.../sources/meta-fsl-arm/recipes-graphics/imx-gpu-viv/imx-gpu-viv_5.0.11.p4.4-hfp.bb,
> do_install) failed with exit code '1'
>
> This is the v2 patch, which is in master-next.
>
> Do you have any idea why it is failing?
>
> I know why this is failing. It is because of the following lines:
>
> # skip packaging X11 specific tools if no X11 support is requested
> if [ "${USE_X11}" = "no" ]; then
> rm ${D}${bindir}/glretrace
> rm ${D}${bindir}/eglretrace
> fi
>
> Apitrace is supported for all the backends now. So, the above lines can be 
> removed.

It makes sense. I confirmed in v1[1] and this has not been change there as well.

1. http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/91211/

I did the change and have put it in the master-next for test again.

Thanks for your help ironing this out.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
-- 
_______________________________________________
meta-freescale mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale

Reply via email to