Hello Igor, On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Igor Grinberg <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/13/15 16:35, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> Hello Valentin, >> Hello Igor, >> >> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Valentin Raevsky >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Add u-boot configuration for cm-fx6 machines. >>> This is a fork of the mainline u-boot with the CompuLab patches on top. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Valentin Raevsky <[email protected]> >> >> The U-Boot recipe is very good. The only remark I believe could be >> addressed would be to name it u-boot-compulab so it does not sounds to >> be machine specific and you have extend it for other machines/sbc/som >> in future. > > I'm not sure I understand this. > Suppose, we have several Freescale SoC based machines, using different > U-Boot versions from different repositories. > How should the recipe be structured/build for such configurations? > Or is it assumed that all the boards are supported by the same > repository/mainline?
In this specific case I would expect one recipe per version, let's say: u-boot-compulab_2014.04.bb u-boot-compulab_2015.04.bb However I think from CompuLab perspective it is easier if all share same U-Boot version. We for example provide U-Boot 2015.04[1] for all (but i.MX6SoloX SabreAUTO) reference boards plus a good amount of 3rd party boards. 1. http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-fsl-arm/tree/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fslc_2015.04.bb?h=fido I don't think you'll end with one U-Boot tree per board, it will be a maintenance nightmare. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
