On 2015-04-28 07:53, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Daiane Angolini <[email protected]> wrote:
For me, only reverting a patch that has been debugged is not a strong
enough argument to have a fork (and all the work behind it). But I
cannot see your future plans for the board.
Just to add on this: I sent a patch that fixes the reported regression
and Gary confirmed it works, so it seems linux-fslc is useable again
with riotboard.
How is this going to be handled? Will you apply your patch
upstream and update the meta-fsl-arm recipe, or just add the
patch there?
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates | Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
--
_______________________________________________
meta-freescale mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
