On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 3:29 AM, Liu Ting <[email protected]> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Daiane >> Angolini >> Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2015 12:06 AM >> To: Liu Ting-B28495 >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 00/11] patches for fsl- >> qoriq-sdk-v1.8 >> >> Generally speaking, all the commit logs should be elaborated. However there >> is >> one point which confused me. >> >> Sometimes, you say "upgrade from XYZ released on SDK1.8", other times you say >> "include the following commits from SDK1.8" >> >> I cannot say if, in second case, you avoided to include some commit present >> in >> SDK1.8 and not upstreamed, or if it's just a language matter. > [Liu Ting-B28495] not all the pkgs have clear history to see what changed > since the previous commit.
Daiane is, correctly, asking for consistency. The commit logs are useful, not now but, in future so they should be as verbose and complete as possible. >> Can you, please, double check? >> >> Regarding the board removed: >> > ls1021aqds: remove as it is not supported >> I don't know what to think. It's weird to me to think a board is removed >> because a new software is included, why not leave it using the old software? > [Liu Ting-B28495] because ls1021aqds was not supported/tested with new > software. > Do you mean keeping old commit for ls1021aqds, using new commit for the > others? again, please include a clear commit log. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
