Hi Ann,
On 07/11/2015 12:33 AM, Ann Thornton wrote:
On 7/10/2015 2:21 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote:
Hi Ann,
On 07/10/2015 09:32 PM, Ann Thornton wrote:
The tools are grouped into core and extended with i.MX specific
tools in a .bbappend file.
Signed-off-by: Ann Thornton <[email protected]>
---
.../packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-tools-core.bb | 39
+++++++++++++++++
.../packagegroup-fsl-tools-extended.bb | 45
++++++++++++++++++++
.../packagegroup-fsl-tools-extended.bbappend | 13 ++++++
3 files changed, 97 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
recipes-fsl/packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-tools-core.bb
create mode 100644
recipes-fsl/packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-tools-extended.bb
create mode 100644
recipes-fsl/packagegroups/packagegroup-fsl-tools-extended.bbappend
Just curious regarding the naming of packagegroup-fsl-tools-core: what
makes it FSL-specific?
Nothing, really. Except that this is fsl-demos. Should it be named
without the fsl?
I think it would be better this way. I also looked at the extended
packagegroup, and it can also go without the fsl.
I'm leaving the final choice to your discretion.
Thanks for the comments!
Ann
Regards,
Nikolay
--
_______________________________________________
meta-freescale mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
