On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Lauren Post <[email protected]> wrote: > Create i.MX 6QuadPlus SABRE Auto Machine supporting > ecspi, flexcan1 and gpmi-weim device trees. > > Create U-Boot configurations for sdcard, eimnor, nand, spinor > sata and mfgtool. > > Signed-off-by: Lauren Post <[email protected]> > --- > conf/machine/imx6qpsabreauto.conf | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 conf/machine/imx6qpsabreauto.conf > > diff --git a/conf/machine/imx6qpsabreauto.conf > b/conf/machine/imx6qpsabreauto.conf > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..0c530b6 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/conf/machine/imx6qpsabreauto.conf > @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ > +#@TYPE: Machine > +#@NAME: Freescale i.MX6Q Plus SABRE Automotive > +#@SOC: i.MX6QP > +#@DESCRIPTION: Machine configuration for Freescale i.MX6QP SABRE Automotive > +#@MAINTAINER: Lauren Post <[email protected]> > + > +require conf/machine/include/imx6sabreauto-common.inc > + > +SOC_FAMILY = "mx6:mx6q:mx6qp"
I see no reason to have a new SoC family for i.MX 6QuadPlus as it is software compatible with i.MX 6Quad. Do we have any use case for it now? otherwise please don't add it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
