On 2015-09-24 07:59, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Daiane Angolini <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Otavio Salvador
<[email protected]> wrote:
The consolidation of all i.MX related base settings allow for a more
global view of the settings in place. Up to now, the i.MX 23 and i.MX
28 SoCs were using the mxs-base.inc file, causing fragmentation.
The changes necessary to keep all i.MX 23 and i.MX 28 reference boards
working properly has been done, some values need to be reworked to
The consolidation of all i.MX related base settings allows a more
global view of the settings in place.
One of the causes of this patch is the fragmentation caused by i.MX23
and i.MX28 SoCs using mxs-base.inc.
The changes needed to get i.MX23 and i.MX28 SoCs working have been
included in imx-base.inc file already, ...
I reworked this as:
---
The consolidation of all i.MX related base settings allows a more
global view of the settings in place.
One of the causes of this patch is the fragmentation caused by i.MX23
One of the reasons for this patch ...
and i.MX28 SoCs using mxs-base.inc.
The changes needed to get i.MX23 and i.MX28 SoCs working have been
included in imx-base.inc file already and some values required rework
to apply to specific SoC families to avoid regressions.
---
Better?
apply to SoC families instead of global setting but the price for
clearness seems worth it.
This piece I don't understand. Are additional changes needed for
future (#FIXME)? Or you are still talking about the motivation of this
patch?
No; just explaining there are changes to avoid regressions. I reworked
the commit log.
...
+UBOOT_MAKE_TARGET_mxs = "u-boot.sb"
+UBOOT_MAKE_TARGET_mx51 = "u-boot.imx"
+UBOOT_MAKE_TARGET_mx53 = "u-boot.imx"
+UBOOT_MAKE_TARGET_mx6 = "u-boot.imx"
+UBOOT_MAKE_TARGET_mx6sl = "u-boot.imx"
+UBOOT_MAKE_TARGET_mx6sx = "u-boot.imx"
Why are you duplicating for sl and sx?
I don't see imx6ul
My fault; I will expand it.
+UBOOT_MAKE_TARGET_mx7 = "u-boot.imx"
+UBOOT_MAKE_TARGET_vf = "u-boot.imx"
+
+UBOOT_SUFFIX_mxs = "sb"
+UBOOT_SUFFIX_mx51 = "imx"
+UBOOT_SUFFIX_mx53 = "imx"
+UBOOT_SUFFIX_mx6 = "imx"
+UBOOT_SUFFIX_mx6sl = "imx"
+UBOOT_SUFFIX_mx6sx = "imx"
Why are you duplicating for sl and sx?
I don't see imx6ul
Ditto.
+UBOOT_SUFFIX_mx7 = "imx"
+UBOOT_SUFFIX_vf = "imx"
+
+UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT_mxs = "0x40008000"
UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT_mx51 = "0x90008000"
UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT_mx53 = "0x70008000"
UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT_mx6 = "0x10008000"
@@ -132,6 +149,7 @@ PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libg2d_mx6ul = ""
# Handle default kernel
IMX_DEFAULT_KERNEL = "linux-imx"
+IMX_DEFAULT_KERNEL_mxs = "linux-fslc"
IMX_DEFAULT_KERNEL_mx5 = "linux-fslc"
IMX_DEFAULT_KERNEL_mx6 = "linux-fslc-mx6"
IMX_DEFAULT_KERNEL_mx6ul = "linux-imx"
@@ -140,8 +158,16 @@ PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel ??=
"${IMX_DEFAULT_KERNEL}"
SDCARD_ROOTFS ?= "${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/${IMAGE_NAME}.rootfs.ext4"
IMAGE_FSTYPES ?= "ext4 sdcard.gz"
-
-SERIAL_CONSOLE = "115200 ttymxc0"
+IMAGE_FSTYPES_mxs ?= "ext4 uboot.mxsboot-sdcard sdcard.gz"
+
+SERIAL_CONSOLE_mxs = "115200 ttyAMA0"
+SERIAL_CONSOLE_mx51 = "115200 ttymxc0"
+SERIAL_CONSOLE_mx53 = "115200 ttymxc0"
+SERIAL_CONSOLE_mx6 = "115200 ttymxc0"
+SERIAL_CONSOLE_mx6sl = "115200 ttymxc0"
+SERIAL_CONSOLE_mx6sx = "115200 ttymxc0"
+SERIAL_CONSOLE_mx7 = "115200 ttymxc0"
+SERIAL_CONSOLE_vf = "115200 ttymxc0"
Can you, please, explain why we cannot have SERIAL_CONSOLE any more
and only override for mxs?
I will rework this.
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates | Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
--
_______________________________________________
meta-freescale mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
