On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Stefan Agner <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2015-10-07 13:58, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> The Vybrid support in the meta-fsl-arm is mostly dead upstream as they >> are non-responsive for the requests we did[1]. In other occasions I >> tried to contact them privately asking for their help and there >> without success. >> >> 1. >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/2015-August/015665.html >> >> The kernel is quite old (3.0.15) and has problems building with >> current toolchain (GCC 5.2) and several known security flaws. >> >> Is there someone willing to adopt it? otherwise I plan to send a >> removal patch for it in next coming days. > > I am willing to maintain a 4.1 (or later) based tree for Vybrid. In > vanilla 4.1, support is fairly well with some pieces missing, e.g. NAND > and graphics driver...
I really appreciate your offer and this goes in the best long-term direction in my opinion. Please let me know if you need any help from me. :-) -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
