Hello Otavio, On 05.11.2015 18:19, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello Christian, > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Christian Ege <[email protected]> wrote: >> I am preparing Patches for the UDOO Neo (http://www.udoo.org/udoo-neo/) >> i.mx6 SoloX based board to be integrated into meta-fsl-arm-extra. I have >> some questions what is the intended work flow for this. >> >> At the moment I have integrated the UDOO Neo board in my fork of >> meta-fsl-arm-extra. >> >> https://github.com/graugans/meta-fsl-arm-extra/tree/fido >> >> - Is it okay to provide patches for fido at first or should new boards >> be introduced to master only? > > master only. Makes sense > >> - How to deal with the various flavours of the Neo Familiy? >> - BASIC with 512MB RAM, Ethernet >> - EXTENDED 1GB RAM, Wi-Fi/Bluetooth, Motion Sensors >> - FULL 1GB RAM, Wi-Fi/Bluetooth, Motion Sensors, Ethernet > > It depends; ideally UDOO ought to work with SPL and same image should > work fine with all the flavours. Wandboard does it, CuBox does it as > well. Okay, at the moment SPL is not supported. But this is an good idea.
> ... >> I Have patches available for the UDOO Quad as-well but no board to test >> on. If there is interest I can provide them as-well > ... > > I prefer you to not send it than; we should have only maintained boards. This is what I've expected. Regards, Christian -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
