Hi Otavio 2016-01-19 15:15 GMT+01:00 Otavio Salvador <[email protected]>: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Max Krummenacher <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Am Montag, den 18.01.2016, 15:51 -0200 schrieb Otavio Salvador: >>> While it is good, as design, allow for easier reuse of the recipe by >>> custom designs (specially SoM-based ones) it requires that we provide >>> common 'defconfig' files. >>> >> >> Wouldn't it then be better to provide such a common defconfig >> additionally? >> If yes I could prepare an alternative patch which adds >> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-toradex-3.14.28/defconfig >> instead of restricting compatible machine. >> I would probably take the current linux-fslc one to cover a greater >> range of drivers and options than what we use for our machines. > > This is indeed an option and I would appreciate it. One even better > one, in my POV, would be if both machines could use a single > defconfig. Would this be possible? > Yes this is possible, one is a subset of the other. I'm still not happy though about size etc. as I outlined in the discussion for the initial commit: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/2015-December/016795.html If you have strong feelings towards the 'one size fits all' solution I might get persuaded (or pressed) to go for it.
Max > -- > Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems > http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br > Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
